Agents61
US equityMobility / deliveryNYSE

Uber on the committee board

Uber is a marketplace that finally prints FCF: mobility take rate, delivery, and advertising. Growth seats classify it; value seats ask if the margin is cyclical or structural.

What isolated seats argue

Coleman/Lynch everyday use vs. Einhorn quality of bookings-to-revenue. Debate: insurance, classification, and whether ads are a third engine.

Filing & structure checks

Take rate vs. incentives, legal classification, and segment contribution. Marketplace metrics in the K, not trip-count tweets.

Uber (UBER)

Analyst · 16 seats

Independent briefs, then clerk assembly · 16 isolated prompts + 1 assembly pass · filing facts from SEC EDGAR (cached 7 days) — not investment advice, no buy button

Ask the desk

Preview seating. Paid desks are 16 / 29 / 48 / 61. $49 is Associate (29), not 61. Partners is the same 61 with more compute.

Isolated briefsAssembly1. Era Trend List2. Cycle Position + Thermometer3. Dual-Track Candidate Pool4. Investment Proposal5. Entry Plan6. Exit Discipline

Filing facts · SEC EDGAR

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · 10-K FY · FY2025 · ended 2025-12-31 · CIK 0001543151

Public filing · not a live quoteFY2025P/E · P/B · P/S cached model input
Revenue (FY)
$52.0B
Revenue YoY
+18.3%
Net income
$10.1B
Diluted EPS
$4.73
ROE
37.2%
LT debt / equity
0.39
P/E
15.3
P/B
5.69
P/S
2.96
Cached price
$72.56
Mkt cap (est.)
$153.8B

Filings from SEC companyfacts (us-gaap). P/B, P/S from cached price × diluted shares vs filings. Not a live quote. Not a live quote, not advice, not a buy button. Missing numbers stay blank; P/E shows n/m when diluted EPS ≤ 0.

Isolated briefs
16 seats · no peeking

Each master researches UBER alone

Same file, different rules. Each brief states a view and why. Briefs are written in isolation so one loud narrative cannot drag the room. The clerk reads them only after they exist. Never “you should buy.” There is no buy button.

Cathie Wood
Disruptive Innovation Lead
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. On UBER, I care whether the decade capital flow still funds this vehicle — revenue YoY 18.3%, revenue $52.0B.

Why

Why: Horizon is 5+ years; reject 12-month price targets as the main frame. If the industry is not on the decade map, I pass without a speech. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Business dig: UBER must still sit inside a funded decade theme — not a tourist ticker. On file: revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%. Method: Horizon is 5+ years; reject 12-month price targets as the main frame. Second rule: Map the name to ARK-style platforms: AI, robotics, energy storage, multiomics, fintech rails. Variant view: the tape often prices the theme; this seat prices whether UBER is the vehicle. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: the era is right and the vehicle is wrong — or the era has already been bid.

Looks at

revenue CAGR vs category S-curve

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: linear legacy business dressed up as disruption.

Philippe Laffont
Tech Commercialization Validator
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. On UBER, I care whether the decade capital flow still funds this vehicle — revenue YoY 18.3%, revenue $52.0B.

Why

Why: A trend is only investable once it hits a commercialization inflection: revenue, not demos. If the industry is not on the decade map, I pass without a speech. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Business dig: UBER must still sit inside a funded decade theme — not a tourist ticker. On file: revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%. Method: A trend is only investable once it hits a commercialization inflection: revenue, not demos. Second rule: Demand proof of unit economics: contribution margin, payback, net retention. Variant view: the tape often prices the theme; this seat prices whether UBER is the vehicle. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: the era is right and the vehicle is wrong — or the era has already been bid.

Looks at

YoY revenue inflection

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: beautiful tech, no buyer with a budget.

Ray Dalio
Debt Cycle Architect
Isolated
cautious

View

Cautious — the file is open, the bar is not cleared. UBER sits on the thermometer before any multiple debate — Late Expansion at 62.

Why

Why: cycle first. The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing. A hot reading is not a ticket. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Regime first: Late Expansion, thermometer 62. The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing. On UBER: On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. I will not time an entry from this chair. I will say whether the print smells mid-cycle or peak. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: treating a regime note as a timing ticket.

Looks at

policy rate vs inflation

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: equity thesis that only works if a late-cycle credit boom never ends.

Howard Marks
Market Pendulum Assessor
Isolated
cautious

View

Cautious — the file is open, the bar is not cleared. UBER sits on the thermometer before any multiple debate — Late Expansion at 62.

Why

Why: cycle first. The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing. A hot reading is not a ticket. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Regime first: Late Expansion, thermometer 62. The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing. On UBER: On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. I will not time an entry from this chair. I will say whether the print smells mid-cycle or peak. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: treating a regime note as a timing ticket.

Looks at

credit spreads vs history

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: priced for perfection in a risk-on pendulum extreme.

John Templeton
Sentiment Extremes Detector
Isolated
cautious

View

Cautious — the file is open, the bar is not cleared. UBER sits on the thermometer before any multiple debate — Late Expansion at 62.

Why

Why: cycle first. The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing. A hot reading is not a ticket. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Regime first: Late Expansion, thermometer 62. The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing. On UBER: On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. I will not time an entry from this chair. I will say whether the print smells mid-cycle or peak. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: treating a regime note as a timing ticket.

Looks at

drawdown from peak

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: priced as if nothing bad can happen.

Benjamin Graham
Margin of Safety Guardian
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. Owner test on UBER: P/E 15.3, P/B 5.69, ROE 37.2%, net income $10.1B.

Why

Why: Teacherly, quantitative, unsentimental. I want a business I would own in full. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Owner earnings lens on UBER. Teacherly, quantitative, unsentimental. Hard rule: Margin of safety: pay well below a conservative appraisal of intrinsic value (classically ~2/3). Numbers on file: P/E 15.3; P/B 5.69; ROE 37.2%; net income $10.1B; revenue YoY 18.3%. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. A low multiple that needs a hero story is not a margin of safety. A rich multiple with durable ROE can still be a business — but then price is the risk. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: a multiple that looks cheap because earnings are peak, or a quality story that needs the multiple to re-rate.

Looks at

P/B

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: price > conservative value with no margin.

Warren Buffett
Moat & Management Final Review
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. Owner test on UBER: P/E 15.3, P/B 5.69, ROE 37.2%, net income $10.1B.

Why

Why: Plain Midwest English, folksy metaphors, long-horizon. I want a business I would own in full. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Owner earnings lens on UBER. Plain Midwest English, folksy metaphors, long-horizon. Hard rule: Circle of competence: if the business cannot be explained simply, pass. Numbers on file: P/E 15.3; P/B 5.69; ROE 37.2%; net income $10.1B; revenue YoY 18.3%. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. A low multiple that needs a hero story is not a margin of safety. A rich multiple with durable ROE can still be a business — but then price is the risk. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: a multiple that looks cheap because earnings are peak, or a quality story that needs the multiple to re-rate.

Looks at

ROIC / ROE durability

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: no durable advantage.

Seth Klarman
Distressed & Special Situations
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. Owner test on UBER: P/E 15.3, P/B 5.69, ROE 37.2%, net income $10.1B.

Why

Why: Cautious, cash-heavy, academic-practitioner. I want a business I would own in full. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Owner earnings lens on UBER. Cautious, cash-heavy, academic-practitioner. Hard rule: Margin of safety is a philosophy, not a slogan — downside first. Numbers on file: P/E 15.3; P/B 5.69; ROE 37.2%; net income $10.1B; revenue YoY 18.3%. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. A low multiple that needs a hero story is not a margin of safety. A rich multiple with durable ROE can still be a business — but then price is the risk. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: a multiple that looks cheap because earnings are peak, or a quality story that needs the multiple to re-rate.

Looks at

downside to liquidation or conservative FCF

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: priced as a quality compounder with no discount.

Duan Yongping
Business Model Clarity Checker
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. Owner test on UBER: P/E 15.3, P/B 5.69, ROE 37.2%, net income $10.1B.

Why

Why: Plain Chinese-internet elder-brother tone: 本分, 买股票就是买公司. I want a business I would own in full. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Owner earnings lens on UBER. Plain Chinese-internet elder-brother tone: 本分, 买股票就是买公司. Hard rule: Buying a stock is buying a piece of a company — if you would not buy the whole business, pass. Numbers on file: P/E 15.3; P/B 5.69; ROE 37.2%; net income $10.1B; revenue YoY 18.3%. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. A low multiple that needs a hero story is not a margin of safety. A rich multiple with durable ROE can still be a business — but then price is the risk. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: a multiple that looks cheap because earnings are peak, or a quality story that needs the multiple to re-rate.

Looks at

business model in one sentence

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: cannot explain how the company makes money without jargon.

Peter Lynch
Ten-Bagger Hunter
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. Classify UBER before cheering growth. revenue YoY 18.3%. P/E 15.3.

Why

Why: Six-category company classification system.. Unclassified growth is a narrative. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Classify before multiple. Six-category company classification system.. revenue YoY 18.3%. P/E 15.3. revenue $52.0B. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. Fast growth with no category is how you buy a story. Stalwart growth with a broken category is how you overstay. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: mis-classification — a cyclical labeled a compounder.

Looks at

EPS growth

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: story is complicated or constantly changing.

Joel Greenblatt
Magic Formula + Special Situations
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. Classify UBER before cheering growth. revenue YoY 18.3%. P/E 15.3.

Why

Why: Author of The Little Book That Beats the Market.. Unclassified growth is a narrative. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Classify before multiple. Author of The Little Book That Beats the Market.. revenue YoY 18.3%. P/E 15.3. revenue $52.0B. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. Fast growth with no category is how you buy a story. Stalwart growth with a broken category is how you overstay. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: mis-classification — a cyclical labeled a compounder.

Looks at

EBIT/EV

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: low ROC dressed up as growth.

David Einhorn
Financial Statement Quality Inquisitor
Isolated
cautious

View

Cautious — the file is open, the bar is not cleared. Invert UBER first. What has to be false for the bull to die?

Why

Why: kill-shot seat. Red team only: interrogate, do not pitch a long Footnotes beat stories. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Invert UBER. Red team only: interrogate, do not pitch a long. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. Name what must be true for the bull: earnings quality, leverage (0.39), and whether footnotes hide the cycle. If I cannot name the kill path, I am not doing the job. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: the fraud/cycle path is in the footnotes and the bull case ignores it.

Looks at

receivables vs revenue

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: earnings quality fails even if the narrative is popular.

Michael Burry
Extreme Contrarian: Hidden Assumptions
Isolated
cautious

View

Cautious — the file is open, the bar is not cleared. Invert UBER first. What has to be false for the bull to die?

Why

Why: kill-shot seat. Red team: dismantle the valuation model's hidden assumptions Footnotes beat stories. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Invert UBER. Red team: dismantle the valuation model's hidden assumptions. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. Name what must be true for the bull: earnings quality, leverage (0.39), and whether footnotes hide the cycle. If I cannot name the kill path, I am not doing the job. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: the fraud/cycle path is in the footnotes and the bull case ignores it.

Looks at

embedded growth rate in the multiple

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: terminal growth or multiple assumes a world that the footnotes contradict.

Charlie Munger
Inversion Thinking Arbiter
Isolated
cautious

View

Cautious — the file is open, the bar is not cleared. Invert UBER first. What has to be false for the bull to die?

Why

Why: kill-shot seat. Invert: how would this thesis get killed? List the kill-shots before the romance Footnotes beat stories. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Invert UBER. Invert: how would this thesis get killed? List the kill-shots before the romance. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. Name what must be true for the bull: earnings quality, leverage (0.39), and whether footnotes hide the cycle. If I cannot name the kill path, I am not doing the job. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: the fraud/cycle path is in the footnotes and the bull case ignores it.

Looks at

incentive structure

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: the idea only works if several things go right at once without a margin.

William O'Neil
CANSLIM Entry Point
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. No trigger, no implied entry on UBER — quality seats do not move this pencil.

Why

Why: without a stage/breakout/turtle trigger, a good business is still not an entry.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Trigger or nothing. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. Stage / breakout / turtle — pick the method this seat uses. A constructive quality seat elsewhere does not create an entry here. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: entering because the committee liked the business.

Looks at

quarterly EPS acceleration

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: laggard in a leading group.

Ed Thorp
Kelly Criterion Position Sizing
Isolated
constructive

View

Constructive — the work is worth continuing, not an order. UBER is a distribution. P/E 15.3; P/B 5.69. Thin sample → smaller size.

Why

Why: if edge is not measurable, Kelly ceiling collapses. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

Analysis

Question: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. UBER is a return distribution, not a feeling. On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached. P/E 15.3; P/B 5.69. If sample is thin or correlations hid risk, size shrinks. Kelly is a ceiling. Underwrite frame: Worth further homework.

Risks

Main risk: overfitting a short sample or sizing as if variance were known.

Looks at

whether a statistical edge is even claimed

On file: 10-K FY FY2025; revenue $52.0B; revenue YoY 18.3%; net income $10.1B; ROE 37.2%; LT debt/equity 0.39; P/E 15.3; P/B 5.7; P/S 3.0; price $72.56 cached.

This seat flips if: no quantified edge.

Committee tables and charts

Counted from isolated briefs. Ratios are filings or cached model input — not a live quote, not a rating, not a buy button.

Stance mix

16
  • constructive10
  • cautious6
  • skeptical0
  • inconclusive0

Cycle scenario fan (%)

0255075100BoomRecoveryStagflationRecession

Valuation and filings (P/E, P/B, …)

MetricValueNote
P/E15.3P/B, P/S from cached price × diluted shares vs filings. Not a live quote.
P/B5.69P/B, P/S from cached price × diluted shares vs filings. Not a live quote.
P/S2.96
ROE37.2%
LT debt / equity0.39
Revenue (FY)$52.0B
Revenue YoY+18.3%
Net income$10.1B
Diluted EPS$4.73
Clerk assembly

Then the briefs are stacked — not averaged

constructive
10
cautious
6
skeptical
0
inconclusive
0

Where they agree

  • The clerk stacked isolated notes on: “Research UBER as a US-listed name.”. Masters did not see each other’s drafts.
  • Quality seats treat “would I own the whole company?” as the filter, not next-quarter beat.

Where they split

  • Value/quality seats ask whether it is a business worth owning; growth seats ask whether the story is still underappreciated. Those are different tests.
  • Debate seats write kill-shots before any clerk summary. They are not asked to “meet in the middle.”

Analyst covers the working 16. Associate adds 13 red-team, cycle, and timing seats (29 total). Exit stays on Committee.

Assembly is a second isolated pass over the briefs. Masters did not read each other. Research simulation — not advice, not a buy button.

Associate unlocks 29 independent seats (29 isolated prompts + 1 assembly pass).

See Associate

Split after isolation

Counted from independent briefs only — not a vote, not a recommendation.

63%
37%
10 constructive 6 cautious / inconclusive 0 skeptical
Step 1 · Where does capital flow over the next decade?

Era Trend List

UBER is mapped against this week’s trend board by the unlocked trend seats. Strength is a committee score, not a price forecast.

AI infrastructure is still in a capex peakStrength 8/10SemiconductorsCloudPower
Digital ads and new consumption have not fully penetratedStrength 7/10InternetConsumer
Decade-scale platforms remain a long-run raceStrength 7/10EVSoftwarePayments
High-return cash compounders are scarcer at higher ratesStrength 6/10Consumer staplesHealthcareExchanges
The trend is diffusing into EM; US-listed ADRs are the windowStrength 5/10EM internetEnergy transition
Step 2 · Where are we in the cycle?

Cycle Position Report

62Late Expansion
Boom
18%
Recovery
22%
Stagflation
27%
Recession
33%
  • Dalio: The short-term debt cycle is hot; long-term debt is still high. This is not crisis pricing.
  • Marks: The pendulum has left midpoint toward optimism, but not yet euphoria.
  • Templeton: There is not enough pessimism to call this a maximum-pessimism buy.
Step 3 · What to buy — why this ticker is in the pool, or not

Why this name (dual track)

Value / Quality track

Benjamin Graham

UBER: screened alone against Margin of Safety Guardian.

Warren Buffett

UBER: screened alone against Moat & Management Final Review.

Seth Klarman

UBER: screened alone against Distressed & Special Situations.

Duan Yongping

UBER: screened alone against Business Model Clarity Checker.

Growth / Opportunity track

Peter Lynch

UBER: screened alone against Ten-Bagger Hunter.

Joel Greenblatt

UBER: screened alone against Magic Formula + Special Situations.

Step 4 · Bull case vs. red-team interrogation — after isolation

Investment Proposal

Debate starts only after independent briefs exist. Red team still does not see a shared draft.

Red-team interrogation

David Einhorn
Earnings quality and accounting traps
Michael Burry
Extreme inversion: what assumptions hide in the model

Charlie MungerDebate chair · inversion: the best way to kill this thesis

Warren BuffettFinal review · 10-year hold test

Full transcript, risk list, and sizing stay on higher seats.

Unlock more seats
Step 5 · When to buy, and how much

Entry Plan

William O'Neil
CANSLIM buy point: cup-with-handle breakout + market-follow-through
Step 6 · When to sell

Exit Discipline

Exit desk (Livermore, Darvas, Bogle accountability) is locked on Analyst.

Unlocks on Committee or Partners (61). Empty seats stay empty — we do not ghost-fill them.

Compare plans

Quant Risk Control

Backtest + sizing + risk budget. Verify every intuition — after the isolated briefs, not instead of them.

Ed Thorp

Agents61 is a research simulation and educational tool. Isolated views, splits, and assembly notes only. Not personalized advice. AI-generated.