An AI investment committee that will not average the room

If you pay for 16, 45 stay empty. That is the product. A louder chat with 61 names sharing one draft is not a committee. You unlock seats; locked methodologies do not silently rewrite the brief.

Staffing is the product. See /pricing and /61-investing-masters.

After isolated writing, a clerk stacks agreements and splits. It does not vote. It does not emit “you should buy.” Read the stack like minutes: agreements first, splits second, eloquence last.

Isolated is the default — seats see the ticker and their rules only. Division of labor is a sequenced pipeline (trend → cycle → selection → debate) where later groups may read earlier notes. Peers inside a group still cannot see each other.

Intermediate investors who already pull quotes elsewhere and want named disagreement on the record. Not beginners who want a button. Not professionals who need a Bloomberg replacement.

Pair with /ai-stock-research and /ai-investing-bot for the full desk loop.